Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Larry Green v. North Carolina Dept of Corr
as 13-7819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CARLTON B. JOYNER, TRESA BROWN TOMLINSON and others
Stanley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17332
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Stanley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17332
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Stanley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Haynes v. I.T.C. Team et al
as 3:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
I.T.C. Team, Tommy D. Dicks, M. A. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley et al v. Bank of America, N.A. successor in interest by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
as 2:2013cv12610
Plaintiff:
Kikotta D. Stanley and Felicia Stanley
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Stanley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv08469
Plaintiff:
Connie D. Stanley and Kenneth H. Stanley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09501
Plaintiff:
Audria D. Stanley
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley v. McGough et al
as 1:2012cv01119
Plaintiff:
Calvin D. Stanley
Defendant:
Mike McGough, Greer and George Vanhook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad Co et al
as 2:2012cv01308
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co , John A Kingery , Chris D Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yokel et al v. Shelton (TV1)
as 3:2012mc00010
Petitioner:
Monty D Yokel and Ken Yokel
Respondent:
D. Stanley Shelton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
