Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Joshi et al v. Joshi et al
as 1:2018cv05426
Defendant:
Advanced Care & Analytics, PC, Jay K Joshi, Institue of Advanced Care & Analytics, PC and others
Plaintiff:
National Pain Centers, LLC and Dr. Jay Joshi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00200
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN, RAYMOND CASTRO, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joshi et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03630
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jay Joshi and National Pain Centers, LLC
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trotman v. Bock et al
as 2:2018cv02481
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr
Defendant:
Dr. Jay Bock, R.N. Jessica Lennon and Dr. Max Minnerop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
BERRY v. JAY, et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT BERRY and JAVON LANCE CROCKETT BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON INC and others
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Star Fabrics Inc v. Carrini Inc et al
as 2:2015cv06965
Defendant:
Carrini Inc, Daisy Shoppe, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Girgis v. Dr. Jay's Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03893
Defendant:
Jeff Boopnana, Dr. Jay's Inc. and Lenox McTagarrt
Plaintiff:
Wael Girgis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carr v. Austin Police Department
as 1:2013cv00749
Respondent:
Austin Police Department
Petitioner:
Dr. Jay A. Carr, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
