Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Barton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02476
Plaintiff: David Harold Barton
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28626
Plaintiff: David Harold Barton
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greer v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00198
Petitioner: David Harold Greer, Jr
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 14-6773
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID HAROLD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MICHAEL HICKS
United States of America v. The Estate of Patricia S. Nilsen et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Estate of Patricia S. Nilsen, Known and Unknown Heirs and Devisees of Patricia S. Nilsen, The Estate of Ida M. Henley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
David Hammond v. Henry Steward
as 14-5455
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID HAROLD HAMMOND
Respondent - Appellee: HENRY STEWARD, Warden
BRADLEY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv00035
Petitioner: DAVID HAROLD BRADLEY
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2014ct03009
Plaintiff: David Harold Johnson
Defendant: State of North Carolina and Michael Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
BRADLEY v. STERN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00347
Plaintiff: DAVID HAROLD BRADLEY
Defendant: GRADY, HOCHGINS and R. STERN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?