Cases 31 - 40 of 284
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Garner v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car et al
as 2:2022cv02676
Plaintiff:
Joe Garner
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and EAN Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Walker v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Renea Walker
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc., Enterprise Leasing Company of Georgia, LLC, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ball, Jr. v. Matt Tortorici et al
as 2:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
Matt Tortorici, Andra B. Walls, E. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
The Crawford Group, Inc. et al v. Sumner
as 4:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
The Crawford Group, Inc. and Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Boyd Sumner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MORRISON v. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
CHARISSE MORRISON
Defendant:
ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
