Cases 31 - 40 of 1,364
WIGGINS v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv20921
Petitioner:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Respondent:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eric Holmes v. Ron Neal
as 23-2890
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC D. HOLMES
Respondent / Appellee:
RON NEAL
Hovde et al v. Freud et al
as 1:2023cv14263
Plaintiff:
Eric D Hovde and Steven D Hovde
Defendant:
Edward P Freud and Ruff, Freud, Breems & Nelson Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HANCOCK v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Petitioner:
ERIC D. HANCOCK
Respondent:
BRADLEY BOOHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WIGGINS v. THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv18504
Petitioner:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Respondent:
THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WIGGINS v. COMMUNITY FAMILY GROUP et al
as 1:2023cv18513
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Defendant:
COMMUNITY FAMILY GROUP, ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. COMMUNITY FAMILY GROUP et al
as 1:2023cv18515
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Defendant:
COMMUNITY FAMILY GROUP, ATL. CO. JUSTICE FACILITY, THOMAS A. DWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ullman v. OBM Miami Inc
as 3:2023cv01772
Plaintiff:
Eric D Ullman
Defendant:
OBM Miami Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Runge v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Roger Runge
Defendant:
Chief Eric D. Smith, Deputy Chief Chad Ochivzzo, Supervisor Ashlee Windler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08431
Plaintiff:
Eric D Morris
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
