Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GREER v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L GREER
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, AARON SMITH, LISA HAMBLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
BRYAN P TUGGLE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHISTOPHER ERTEL, VINCE STANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv04353
Plaintiff:
MAHALA ZOELLE BEY and KIESHA ANN JONES
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Chris Carr, DAVID ERTEL and others
BEY v. BIDEN et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
MAHALA ZOELLE BEY and KIESHA ANN JONES
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRIS CARR, DAVID ERTEL and others
Criado et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv05656
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Criado, Albert Marcellus Morton, Alonzo Lewis and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ERTEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16981
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ERTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IWCO Direct Holdings Inc. et al v. Wambold et al
as 0:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
IWCO Direct Holdings Inc. and Instant Web, LLC doing business as IWCO Direct
Defendant:
Michael Ertel, Michael Logar, Nahan Printing, Inc. and others
Giles v. Cmty Loan Servicing
as 20-30780
Defendant / Appellee:
David Ertel and Community Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lewis Giles, Jr.
Giles v. Community Loan Servicing, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv02238
Defendant:
David Ertel, Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C. and Community Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lewis Giles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
