Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv01722
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. A. Bledsoe and G. Maldonado, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rudy Stanko v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-2868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDY G. STANKO
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Individually, National Directory of the Bureau of Prisons, HERRELL WATTS, Individually, Administrator of National Appeals, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, Individually, North Central Regional Director of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and others
Andrew Wolters v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-30717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW WOLTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FRED MENIFEE, JOE KEFFER and others
Armour v. Fox et al
as 1:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Charles William Armour
Defendant:
John B Fox, Harrall Watts, G Maldonado, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McQueen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Anthony McQueen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James S Davis v. Andre Birotte JR et al
as 8:2010cv00633
Defendant:
Jason K Axe, Andre Birotte JR, M. Travis Bragg and others
Plaintiff:
James S Davis
Davis v. Bragg et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Defendant:
Jason K. Axe, Andre Birotte, Jr., M. Travis Bragg and others
Plaintiff:
James S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Defendant:
L. BREESE, MAUREEN CRUZ, BLAKE DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY STANKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James S Davis v. M Travis Bragg et al
as 1:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
James S Davis
Defendant:
M. Travis Bragg, Lee Limas, Joyce Zoldak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fp
James S Davis v. M Travis Bragg et al
as 5:2010cv00476
Defendant:
M. Travis Bragg, Does, Lee Limas and others
Plaintiff:
James Steven Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
