Cases 31 - 40 of 8,130
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant:
AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant:
PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company
Interested Party:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant:
BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
Elorreaga et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 4:2021cv05696
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Elorreaga and Rosemary Elorreaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Halowell et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv07647
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Halowell, Sr. and Martha C. Halowell
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Carrier Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dugger et al v. McCormick et al
as 1:2016cv03912
Plaintiff:
Dugger, John Dugger, Jr., Melody Natishin and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Hampshire Industries, Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Jenkins Valves, Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
The William Powell Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
BRADLEY et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv02513
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, LLC, AURORA PUMP, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER CO., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BRADLEY and KENNETH E. BRADLEY
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and A.W. CHESTERTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gordon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 5:2021cv01097
Defendant:
Hollow Center Packing Co., John Doe (1 through 100), BASF Catalysts LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon and David W. Gordon, Sr.
Cross Claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
HOLCZER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv00420
Defendant:
SQUARE D COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, HARDIE TYNES and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. HOLCZER and WANDA HOLCZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
