Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Hoye v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hoye
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw and Harold Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES EMBASSY et al
as 2:2011cv04966
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY, JOHN DOE, JOSEPH AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66699
Plaintiff:
HAROLD TAYLOR
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE CO., CAPE INSULATION CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR et al v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 2:2010cv64150
Plaintiff:
PHILIP HAROLD TAYLOR
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley Carl Brown v. Federal Bureau of Pris et al
as 10-6238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY CARL BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Warden, AL HAYNES, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hutchinson v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chad Hutchinson
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, United States Bureau of Prisons, Harold Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Woods v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Sammie Woods
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, United States Bureau of Prisons, Harold Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
