Cases 31 - 40 of 36,509
Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Karyl Clarke
Defendant:
City of North Las Vegas, Clark County School District, Brenda Larsen-Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Damme v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Henry Van Damme
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
US v. William Horne, IV
as 24-6534
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY HORNE, IV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McKinney v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Counselor Rauls, COII Shakristy Lewis, SGT Henry Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dewayne McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. METHUSELAH TREE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
METHUSELAH TREE LLC, ROBERT ROSS, RLR ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jane Doe 11 v. Jarecki
as 1:2024cv04208
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 11
Defendant:
Henry Jarecki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner:
STEVEN MILLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salsman v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Salsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Melinda Adams, Michelle A. Henry, Esquire and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
