Cases
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
US v. Twitty
as 09-1932
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JERRARD J. TWITTY, a/k/a Hot Rod
International Hot Rod Assoc v. Zimmer-Zampese & Associates, et al
as 09-20341
Plaintiff - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL HOT ROD ASSOCIATION, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: ZIMMER-ZAMPESE & ASSOCIATES, INC, San Antonio Raceway, ROBERT C ZAMPESE and TODD ZAMPESE
Botts v. Proflow, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00080
Plaintiff: Rae Botts
Defendant: Proflow, Inc., Ted Leverette, II, Chuck Wehunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Rodney Jenkins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-4400
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RODNEY JENKINS, a/k/a Hot Rod, a/k/a JR, a/k/a Clifton Howard, a/k/a RJ, a/k/a Robney Jenkins
HENSON v. National Hot Rod Association
as 4:2008cv03635
Plaintiff: FRED HENSON
Defendant: National Hot Rod Association
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
International Hot Rod Association, LLC v. Zimmer-Zampese & Associates, Inc et al
as 4:2008cv03368
Plaintiff: International Hot Rod Association, LLC
Defendant: Zimmer-Zampese & Associates, Inc, Robert C Zampese and Todd Zampese
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
National Hot Rod Association v. General Sales and Service, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01032
Plaintiff: National Hot Rod Association
Defendant: General Sales and Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Joe Drake v. Boyd Coddington Hot Rod & Collectibles Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2008cv00545
Plaintiff: Joe Drake and Joe Drake
Defendant: Boyd Coddington Hot Rod & Collectibles Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hot Rods & Horsepower LLC v. Edgerton
as 3:2007cv00740
Plaintiff: Hot Rods & Horsepower LLC
Defendant: Gordon L. Edgerton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?