Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Amir et al v. Sunny's Coach Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Amir , Soloman Assefa , Ishaku E. Atam and others
Defendant:
Sunny's Executive Sedan Service, Incorporated and Shafqat Iqbal Chaudry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Poonum Ijaz, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-2128
Petitioner:
POONUM IJAZ and QASIM JAVAID, also known as QASIM JAVED
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ijaz Haider v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60629
Petitioner:
IJAZ HAIDER
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America, ex rel Dr. Ijaz Mahmood v. Elizabethtown Hematology Oncology, PLC., et al
as 3:2011cv00376
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Ijaz Mahmood
Defendant:
Elizabethtown Hematology Oncology, PLC, Rafiq U. Rahman and Yusuf K. Deshmukh
Movant:
Theodore L. Mussler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Hussain v. Holder
as 10-5265
Petitioner:
Ijaz Hussain, AKA Muhammad Arif
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, United States Attorney General
AZIZ et al v. AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01995
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RAZAK AZIZ , KASHIF IRFAN , INAYET SAHIN and others
Defendant:
AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC. and AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ameran Investments, Inc. v. Rehman et al
as 4:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Ameran Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Razaur Rehman and Ijaz Mughal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01817
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
