Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Downs v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Thurmon L. Downs
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, J. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kring et al v. M&G USA Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00529
Plaintiff:
Terry Kring , Kevin Molin , Leonardo Montoya and others
Defendant:
M&G USA Corporation, M&G Chemicals, Integrity Mechanical Specialists LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Slaughter v. White et al
as 2:2016cv01067
Plaintiff:
Ossie Lee Slaughter
Defendant:
Dan White, Jack Warner, Timothy C Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Clayton
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Tim Ioky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Clayton
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Tim Ioky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2016mc00017
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Clayton
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Tim Ioky and others
In re: Luther Clayton
as 16-11006
Petitioner:
In re: LUTHER J. CLAYTON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Quiles v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 5:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
Edwin Quiles
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Miguel Perez, David Uliano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald Naylor, et al v. Securiguard, Incorporated, et al
as 14-60637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD R. NAYLOR, ANTHONY JENKINS, JAMES E. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECURIGUARD, INCORPORATED, PATRICIA MARVIL, JOHN OXENDINE and others
Hydron v. Hougas et al
as 3:2012cv03328
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
S Hougas, D Biermann, J Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
