Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Woburn Retirement System v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv08925
Plaintiff:
Woburn Retirement System
Defendant:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Carolyn J. Logan and Adam C. Derbyshire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Siverly v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv04674
Plaintiff:
Robert Siverly
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marcus Hardy, J Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05892
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Logan
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brotherhood Mutual Ins Co v. Salem Baptist Church Jenkintow, et al
as 13-4546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH JENKINTOWN, WALTER J. LOGAN, JR., DELTA ALLIANCE LLC and others
Logan et al v. U.S. Bank NA
as 2:2013cv02075
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Michael J Logan and Dayna Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Logan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02885
Plaintiff:
Nkosaithi J. Logan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Logan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-02885
Plaintiff:
Nkosaithi J. Logan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Jessie Logan v. Cecil Polley
as 13-2578
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSIE J. LOGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
CECIL POLLEY, Acting Warden
Logan et al v. Victoria Townhomes et al
as 0:2013cv01778
Plaintiff:
Lewis J. Logan and Elizabeth W. Logan
Defendant:
Victoria Townhomes and Clifton Johnson
Logan v. Greenspoon Marder, P. A.
as 0:2013cv60209
Plaintiff:
Betty J Logan
Defendant:
Greenspoon Marder, P. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
