Cases 31 - 40 of 31,281
Juan Moreno Colindres v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1533
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO MORENO COLINDRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
HSBC Bank USA National Association v. Burgos et al
as 1:2024cv22241
Defendant:
Juan Gomez, Unknown Spouse of Juan Gomez, Rafael Burgos and others
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
(HC) Ortega Morales III v. McVay et al
as 2:2024cv01647
Petitioner:
Juan Ortega Morales III
Respondent:
M. McVay and L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PINELL et al v. PROENTEL INDY LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
ERICK ANTONIO PINELL, JUAN FRANCISCO JARQUIN, GERALD OSWALDO URBINA and others
Defendant:
PROENTEL INDY LLC doing business as PROENTEL USA and JULIO GUERRERO
Williams et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03095
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams, Christopher Mosby, Gabrial E. Cummings and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Betancur et al
as 5:2024cv03463
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Juan D. Yabur Betancur and El Bumangues Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
United States of America v. Arau (Jones)
as 24-1549
Defendant:
HENRY JONES, XAVIER ARAU, CASSIUS MILLER and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Rincon-Rincon
as 24-40414
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Roberto Rincon-Rincon
Laborin Ledesma v. Garland
as 24-3608
Petitioner:
JUAN LABORIN LEDESMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Esona-Mamani, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3609
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS CARLOS ESONA-MAMANI, I, SENNEN DEHIARINE ARROSPIDE MONTALVO, I and ADRIANO GABRIEL ESONSA ARROSPIDE, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
