Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Potter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32810
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Davis Potter and Isaac Potter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORPORATE AIR, LLC v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
CORPORATE AIR, LLC
Defendant:
JONATHAN BROOKS DAVIS and JACQUELINE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davis v. Payne et al
as 2:2013cv11538
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Jacqueline Davis
Defendant:
David Payne and Carter Akinrul
Davis v. Quality Care Services Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02524
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Davis
Defendant:
Quality Care Services Inc and Jonathan Douglas, Sr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAVIS v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 5:2011cv00456
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH JACQUELINE DAVIS
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Marchant v. New York City Board of Electio
as 11-4453
Plaintiff:
Arlene Dacares, Carolyn Younger Nolan, Larry L. Moore and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Garth Marchant
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Board of Elections, Juan Carlos Polanco, President, Jose Miguel Araujo and others
Marchant et al v. New York City Board Of Elections et al
as 1:2011cv04099
Defendant:
Jose Miguel Araujo, New York City Board Of Elections, Juan Carlos Polanco and others
Plaintiff:
Bishop Frank Best, Chauntae Brown, Anna Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 1:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Davis
Defendant:
Robert Earl Taylor , Building Plastics Inc and Liberty Mutual Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe
as 1:2010cv03153
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Davis
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
