Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03543
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Randolph Raphael v. Eric H. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv02746
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Tom Michna, Stanley Sniff and others
Plaintiff:
James Randolph Raphael
James Payne v. USA
as 12-10480
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RANDOLPH PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miller et al v. Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD et al
as 2:2011cv12086
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Miller , Bruce Seyburn , Arthur Wirth and others
Defendant:
Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD, Hugh Regan, Ted Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00511
Petitioner:
James Randolph Payne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wang v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv09016
Plaintiff:
Jessica Wang
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and James Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Alexander v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
James Randolph Alexander
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sirmans et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17181
Plaintiff:
James Randolph Sirmans and Mary Catherine Sirmans
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Randolph v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2008cv01322
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Monsanto Company, Monsanto Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Randolph, James Randolph and James Randolph
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Simms v. CIT Group/Consumer Finance et al
as 2:2008cv02655
Plaintiff:
Cathy Simms and Cathy Simms
Defendant:
CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Sun Mortgage Company, LLC, Accurate Title and Escrow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
