Cases 31 - 40 of 121
THRUSTON v. JONES et al
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
JOSEPH MOORE, JACK JONES, ROLAND and others
Plaintiff:
DAMAREO LAVAD THRUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUST et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARSHALL, TIMMIE JONES, JOHN GAINEY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brust et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Marshall, Timmie Jones, John Gainey and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Moore et al v. NB Net Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07483
Defendant:
Bayzeed Chowdhury, NB NET SOLUTIONS 29 INC, NB NET SOLUTIONS INC and others
Plaintiff:
Anisha Hines, Luis Dalmau, Jamar Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thruston v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00285
Defendant:
Joseph Moore, Sgt. Roland, Jack Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Damareo Lavad Thruston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thruston v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damareo L. Thruston
Defendant:
Joseph Moore, Sgt. Roland, Jack Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios et al v. Exclusive Prepaid NY I Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00996
Defendant:
Ajay Angras, Exclusive Prepaid NY I Inc. and Exclusive Prepaid NY I Inc. doing business as Metro PCS
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rios and Joseph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Everson v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2018cv02866
Defendant:
Joseph Moore, J. Fox and Shelby County Sheriff's Dept.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Everson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer Boston St Properties I LP v. Trevia Young et al
as 2:2018cv09334
Defendant:
Joseph Moore, Trevia Young, Prince Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Palmer Boston St Properties I LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. CITY OF WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2018cv00936
Defendant:
JOSEPH MOORE and CITY OF WASHINGTON
Plaintiff:
WENDY J. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
