Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Rawlings v. Arnold et al
as 2:2015cv02169
Plaintiff:
Derek Rawlings, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Arnold, K. Boykin, K. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INOC Properties, L.P. et al v. Jackson et al
as 4:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
INOC Properties, L.P. , INOC Inc and Rodney K Gray
Defendant:
Frank Jackson and City of Prairie View
Counter_claimant:
INOC Properties, L.P. , INOC Inc and Rodney K Gray
Counter_defendant:
City of Prairie View and Frank Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP v. Gray et al
as 1:2014cv00900
Defendant:
Sean K Gray and Ronda M Stark
Plaintiff:
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Counter_defendant:
Robert M Zimmerman , Mark A Vander Laan , Thomas J Bonasera and others
Counter_claimant:
Sean K Gray and Ronda M Stark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLAND v. CORIZON CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014cv01442
Defendant:
D. ALLEN, JOHN B. CLARKSON, CORIZON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
LINDA K GRAY
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gray v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv02311
Plaintiff:
Cynthia K Gray
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Robert Gray
as 14-5959
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT K. GRAY
Gray v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00594
Petitioner:
Adrian K. Gray
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SISK v. PENCE et al
as 2:2013cv00407
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, L. COLLINS, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
