Cases 31 - 40 of 2,678
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv07879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ciardullo v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv02091
Defendant:
Justin Weiss, Emily Mims, Anthony Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Ciardullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Attre v. Garland
as 24-6653
Petitioner:
RAJIV KUMAR ATTRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
KUMAR v. MARTINEZ ALVAREZ et al
as 2:2024cv10131
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, LMX TRANSPORT CORP and SANDY MARTINEZ ALVAREZ
Plaintiff:
SANJEEV KUMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murphy v. BD Trucklines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Dennis Murphy
Defendant:
Jitender Kumar and BD Trucklines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kumar v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2024cv12710
Petitioner:
Manish Kumar
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caplan et al v. Dollinger et al
as 1:2024cv07996
Plaintiff:
Peter Turkl, Robert G. Riviere, Melissa Roth and others
Defendant:
Alexandra "Alex" Hoffman, Kumar Abhishek, Vegaste Technologies US Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
