Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Lovern v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv01525
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alan Lovern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brownlee et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Renoldo Brownlee , Michael Caballero , Ronald Chamberlain and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnston v. Dooley et al
as 4:2015cv04126
Plaintiff:
David H. Johnston
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk, Marty Jackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovern et al v. Kindred Hospital Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2015cv02167
Plaintiff:
Tamara Lovern and Douglas Lovern
Defendant:
Kindred Hospital Limited Partnership and Ridgecrest Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA, et al v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Am, et al
as 14-7186
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Prescott Lovern
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prescott Lovern
Defendant - Appellee:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Merrill Lynch Credit Products, LLC, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc. and others
Lovern v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv15423
Plaintiff:
Vicki Lynn Lovern
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lovern v. Dorscheid, et al
as 14-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNY LOVERN
Defendant - Appellee:
BART DORSCHEID, Investigator, Eighteenth Judical District Attorney's Office and KNIGHT, Chief Investigator, Eighteenth Judicial District Attorney's Office
Loverne et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv08971
Plaintiff:
Beverly Kay Loverne
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
