Cases 31 - 40 of 3,628
Fuss v. Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Fuss
Defendant:
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., Circle K Stores, Inc., City Hive Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Unknown Plaintiff v. 354 UNITS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE LABELED AS ELF BAR EB DESIGN AIRO MAX DISPOSABLE (5000 PUFFS) IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv02767
Defendant:
354 UNITS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE LABELED AS ELF BAR EB DESIGN AIRO MAX DISPOSABLE (5000 PUFFS) IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v.354 Units, more or less, of an article labeled as ELF BAR EB Design Airo Max Disposable (5000 Puffs) in various flavors, ET AL.
as 2:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
354 UNITS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE LABELED AS ELF BAR EB DESIGN AIRO MAX DISPOSABLE (5000 PUFFS) IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4 et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4, 2.92 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: N/2SW/4, 1.45 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: S/2SW/4 with exception and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Turner v. Fox More Staffing et al
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Fox More Staffing, Michael James, Michael Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods in Twsp. 149, et al
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across and others
Devin Howard v. Jamie Onion, et al
as 24-3273
Plaintiff:
DEVIN D. HOWARD
Defendant:
JAMIE ONION, RONALD PARMERTOR, MICHAEL J. GERARDI and others
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Manuel Quinonez Silvestre, PennyMac Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $502,869.00 MORE OR LESS, IN FUNDS FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN PNC BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXX0996
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$502,869.00 MORE OR LESS, IN FUNDS FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN PNC BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXX0996
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
United States of America v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Defendant:
Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Dr. John H. Gilmore, Vickie S. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
