Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Mary Richard, et al
as 16-4150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY RICHARD, Correctional Officer, CLINT RAMSEY, Correctional Officer and JOHN DEAL, Correctional Officer
Allen Caffey v. Lucas Maue, et al
as 15-3772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN N. CAFFEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LUCAS MAUE, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center, TODD SCOTT, Sergeant, Menard Correctional Center, CHAD HASEMEYER, Sergeant, Menard Correctional Center and others
Desjarlais v. Pierce County, ND et al
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Desjarlais
Defendant:
Pierce County, ND , Matthew Lunde , Mary Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Marie Richards
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Richard et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00934
Plaintiff:
Marie Richard and Albert Richard
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Richards v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mary Richards
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. Stryker Corporation et al
as OR/1:14-cv-00050
Plaintiff:
Mary Richards
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Richards v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00050
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mary Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mary Richard et al v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09236
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Does and Summit Management Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mary Richard and Willie Richard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
