Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 132
Smith v. Zantout We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv00009
Petitioner: Michael Dale Smith and Michael D. Smith
Respondent: Mohamed Zantout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00014
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Honeycutt v. Smith
as 5:2019hc02331
Respondent: Donna M. Smith
Petitioner: Michael Dale Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PASSMORE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00573
Petitioner: MICHAEL DALE PASSMORE
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Bottenfield v. James Robertson
as 19-17184
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL DALE BOTTENFIELD
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES ROBERTSON, Warden, PBSP
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Laxton Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00696
Defendant: Elite Property & Development, LLC, Laxton's Heating, Cooling & Electrical, Inc., Laxton Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marvel v. Muskogee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2019cv00823
Plaintiff: Michael Dale Marvel
Defendant: Nalani Ching, Larry Vickers and Muskogee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2019cv03676
Petitioner: MICHAEL DALE
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marvel v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00690
Plaintiff: Michael Dale Marvel
Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Bottenfield v. Robertson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01105
Respondent: James Robertson
Petitioner: Michael Dale Bottenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?