Cases 31 - 40 of 53
MANS v. TNT POWERWASH, INC.
as 1:2014cv00350
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MANS
Defendant:
TNT POWERWASH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
DeNino v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv13101
Plaintiff:
David J. DeNino
Defendant:
Liam R. Jones, Peter Konstankos, Alfred T. Ingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Manning/Rogers v. Curtis Meinzer, et al
as 13-2937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Michael Manning/Rogers
Defendant - Appellee:
Curtis Meinzer, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, James Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, Larry D. May, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States v. Michael Manning
as 13-1016
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Manning
Manning v. Federal Savings Bank, The
as 2:2012cv02640
Plaintiff:
Michael Manning
Defendant:
Federal Savings Bank, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carolyn Hairston et al v. Ally Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv05016
Plaintiff:
Deborah Albritton, Rick Albritton, Magdalena Avila and others
Defendant:
Ally Bank, Ally Financial, Inc., Does and others
Robert Potter et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2011cv10255
Plaintiff:
Angela Mastromonico, Anthony Armand, Joseph Gordon and others
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Priority Posting and Publication, LPS Default Title and Closing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rivers v. Town of Windsor et al
as 1:2011cv02770
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Emil, Town of Windsor and Michael Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv60585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
