Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Progressive Solutions, Inc. v. Michael Stanley, et al
as 18-15946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STANLEY and CITY OF OAKLAND
Great American Insurance Company of New York v. Mrosak et al
as 0:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company of New York
Defendant:
Michael Stanley Mrosak , Raymond A. Warell and Margene Toraason Reno
Thirdparty_defendant:
Brett Bahr and Vera I Stephenson
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Margene Toraason Reno and Michael Stanley Mrosak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnston v. USA
as 6:2017cv00240
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01856
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Townsel v. Thomas et al
as 4:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Townsel
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Solutions, Inc. v. Michael Stanley, et al.,
as 3:2016cv04805
Plaintiff:
Progressive Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Stanley and City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
US v. Olanitan Olaniyi
as 16-7041
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OLANITAN MICHAEL OLANIYI, a/k/a Richard Allman, a/k/a Thomas Duval, a/k/a Gabriel Palmer, a/k/a Michael Salman, a/k/a Michael Stanley
Morris v. USA
as 2:2016cv00611
Petitioner:
Michael Stanley Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Michael Morris
as 16-3708
Movant:
In re: MICHAEL STANLEY MORRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stanley v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03915
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
