Cases 31 - 40 of 89
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18227
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MICHAEL WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00416
Petitioner:
ZACHARY MICHAEL WEBB
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb v. Rhea County Tennessee
as 1:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Administrator Michael Wbb and Michael Webb
Defendant:
Rhea County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Fort Worth Police Department
as 4:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Fort Worth Police Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81927
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38756
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv01282
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LILLY WEBB, CHRISTINA WEBB and MICHAEL WEBB
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael Webb
as 19-11263
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WEBB
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GARRETT v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03262
Plaintiff:
BRENT BERGENER, JIBRIEL STARKS, MICHAEL JACQUES and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02250
Plaintiff:
Brent Bergener, Jibriel Starks, Michael Jacques and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
