Cases 31 - 40 of 353
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
United States of America v. Mickens
as 4:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brei Mickens
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Frank et al v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Dequincy Frank and Quinton Mickens
Defendant:
United States of America, Fredneisha Nichols and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Nelson Mickens, Jr. v. State of Georgia
as 23-10677
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON MICKENS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Nelson Mickens v. Coffee CF Warden, et al
as 22-14337
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON MICKENS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
COFFEE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Mickens v. Morrissey
as 1:2022cv03054
Plaintiff:
Charles Mickens
Defendant:
John P Morrissey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Givens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv03577
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Givens
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Dir. Brian P. Stirling, Regional Dir. Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mickens Jr. v. Danforth
as 1:2022cv03457
Petitioner:
Nelson Mickens Jr.
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICKENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20600
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MICKENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tommy G. Mickens, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Tommy G. Mickens, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
