Cases 31 - 40 of 528
Mock et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
William T Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition Inc and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mock v. Griner et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Jeffrey Mock
Defendant:
Benjamin Griner, Bradley Carlson, Chandler McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Effingham County Jail
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Benito David Bryant
Defendant:
Effingham County Jail, Effingham Sheriff's Dept. and W. Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv10525
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Mock
Defendant:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Dawson v. Mock
as 0:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krysten Garner v. Warren Baltes, et al
as 23-10130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KRYSTEN GARNER
Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN BALTES, JUSTIN MOCK, LOWELL CLARK and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Carter v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Effingham County Sheriff's Department, Winston Mock, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023xc00232
Plaintiff:
William T Mock, Christopher Lewis and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
