Cases 31 - 40 of 4,727
Moses v. Source Digital, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02972
Plaintiff:
Dean Moses
Defendant:
Source Digital, Inc. and Shawn Grant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Wiederhold & Kummerlen, P.A. et al
as 9:2024cv80482
Defendant:
Wiederhold & Kummerlen, P.A., WIEDERHOLD, MOSES, KUMMERLEN & WARONICKI, P.A., John Wiederhold and others
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal National Mortgage Association v. 245 Sullivan Ave LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02868
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
245 Sullivan Ave LLC, Moses Neuman, Solomon Steinmetz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
George v. cawston et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, andrew joseph, jr and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
George v. The Colville Confederated Tribes et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, Richard Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Stancil
as 24-1139
Petitioner:
GARY L. BALDWIN
Respondent:
MOSES STANCIL, C.D.O.C. Executive Director
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
