Cases 31 - 40 of 439
NATALE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JUSTIN NATALE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COULTER v. COULTER et al
as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
JAMES P. COULTER, SUSAN VERO COULTER, KAREN VERO MORROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WESLEY v. NORRIS et al
as 1:2022cv02212
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY J. WESLEY, JR.
Defendant:
BREQUE NORRIS, NATALE HAWN and MAUREEN WALBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Naomi Haynes
as 22-13785
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NAOMI NATAL HAYNES
Natale v. Smiths Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
Catherine Natale
Defendant:
Smiths Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Catherine A. Blevins et al v. Synagro Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01866
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE A. BLEVINS, an individual, BARBARA BRYSON, an individual, ALICE M. CARRIGAN, an individual and others
Defendant:
Synagro Technologies, Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Synagro-WWT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al
as 22-13404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT MEIDE
Defendant / Appellee:
PULSE EVOLUTION CORPORATION, JOHN TEXTOR, GREGORY CENTINEO and others
Jean Germain v. William Beeman
as 22-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BEEMAN, RN, HOWARD LEE COOK, Dr., JOHN DOE, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
