Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Lear v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Nathan W Lear
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pogue v. Molan et al
as 6:2016cv01322
Defendant:
Marchington, Molan, Sheriff Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan W. Pogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Pleus v. ARP FAMILY FARMS, an Arizona general partnership et al
as 2:2015cv02093
Defendant:
Nathan W. Arp, Arp Custom Farming, LLC, Arp Family Farms and others
Plaintiff:
Albert H. Pleus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Nathan Clouser v. Todd Johnson, et al
as 15-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN W. CLOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD JOHNSON, REGIS VOGLE and JOHN GOSHERT
Lyon v. First Choice Loan Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv04732
Plaintiff:
NATHAN W. LYON
Defendant:
FIRST CHOICE LOAN SERVICES, INC. and FIRST CHOICE BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. NWH Management, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00905
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant:
NWH Management, LLC and Nathan W. Halsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Med Ag Ventures Incorporated et al v. Ducey et al
as 2:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
Med Ag Ventures Incorporated , Dane J Dukat and Justin T Cifelli
Defendant:
Cole P Ducey, Raw CNC LLC, Nathan W Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
United States of America v. Today.com Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Today.com Incorporated, Nathan W Gwilliam, Dale R Gwilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Nathan Clouser v. Todd Johnson, et al
as 14-3936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN W. CLOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD JOHNSON, REGIS VOGLE and JOHN GOSHERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
