Cases 31 - 40 of 53
HIRSCHKORN v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2019cv00310
Defendant:
DAVIS, MACK, SPEIGHTS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R HIRSCHKORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Muiga et al
as 8:2019cv01667
Defendant:
Lt. Carver, Captain Branch, Sgt. Muiga and others
Plaintiff:
Jameria Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Broadhead v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Correctional Brunson, S. Caldwin, Kimberly Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. J. Reuben Long Detention Center
as 1:2019cv00152
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Center, Officer Michael, Officer Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Edward James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Wiggins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Correctional Brunson, Correctional Officer Austin, Brittany Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Gammon et al
as 6:2018cv00130
Defendant:
Officer Joseph Altomare, Officer Alexander Gammon and Officer Austin Forker
Plaintiff:
Calvin B. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Gammon et al
as 4:2018cv00307
Defendant:
Officer Joseph Altomare, Officer Alexander Gammon and Officer Austin Forker
Plaintiff:
Calvin B. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Hutchins et al
as 4:2018cv02364
Defendant:
Lieutenant Carey King, Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr., Director/interm Stuart Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Mundine v. Dorthy Kirschvick, et al
as 17-20763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY MUNDINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DORTHY W. KIRSCHVICK, CURTIS BRIDGES, BENITO MOYA and others
Mundine v. Kirschvick et al
as 4:2017cv03380
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Mundine
Defendant:
Dorthy W. Kirschvick, Curtis Bridges, Benito Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
