Cases 31 - 40 of 9,872
Patton v. Ealey et al
as 5:2024cv10771
Plaintiff:
Steven Patton
Defendant:
Tina Ealey, R. Green, Peterson and others
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNRUN INC. et al
as 3:2024cv06441
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company a/s/o Robert Petrson and Megan Peterson
Defendant:
SUNRUN INC., Sunrun Installation Services, Inc. and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Peterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Blake Peterson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholas GarnerIn re: Nicholas Garner
as 24-5506
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS COREY GARNER, aka Frank Marten, aka Clark David Thomson, aka Wallace Steeves, aka Neal Marion, aka Ronald Peterson, aka Patrick Steele, Nicholis Corey Garner
TruConnect Communication, Inc. v. Peterson
as 24-3297
Plaintiff:
TRUCONNECT COMMUNICATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
RACHEL PETERSON, n her official capacity as Executive Director of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and in her individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cantu v. Austin Plce Dept
as 24-50397
Plaintiff:
M. Patricia Cantu and Roberto Cantu
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, Michael Joseph, Sergeant, Austin Police Department, Jacob Beirowski, Officer, Austin Police Department and others
Peterson v. Subit et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David W Peterson
Defendant:
Michael C Subit and Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
