Cases 31 - 40 of 1,246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crowley et al v. Portillo et al
as 1:2024cv10424
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Crowley and Kimberly Crowley
Defendant:
Osman Portillo and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Portillo et al v. CoStar Group Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Portillo, Alicia Coakley, Freddy Barajas and others
Defendant:
CoStar Group, Inc., Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Hyatt Hotels Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez Portillo v. Garland
as 24-335
Petitioner:
ABEL HERNANDEZ PORTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Portillo-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-639
Petitioner:
DELBER PORTILLO-PORTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Portillo et al v. Noonanju Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Cesar Portillo, Norma Lorena Sagastume, Romeo Umana and others
Defendant:
Noonanju Incorporated doing business as Food for Thought, Anju Kathuria and Bobby Kathuria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Portillo-Jandres v. Garland
as 24-60054
Petitioner:
Walter De Los Angeles Portillo-Jandres
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Spiehs v. Armbrister et al
as 5:2024cv04005
Plaintiff:
Justin Spiehs
Defendant:
Jay Armbrister, Tyler Kruzel, Jimmy Wold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
