Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Cheneau v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2014cv00384
Plaintiff:
Quintina Cheneau
Defendant:
Bank of America NA and Crouch & Ramey, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice v. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2014cv02092
Plaintiff:
Quintina Rice
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Watkins-Perkins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05062
Plaintiff:
Quintina D. Watkins-Perkins and Curtis Perkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Jewel Osco Food Stores
as 1:2013cv06761
Plaintiff:
Quintina Rogers
Defendant:
Jewel Osco Food Stores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Ormond v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv10702
Plaintiff:
Quintina Ormond
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quintina Huerta v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60273
Petitioner:
QUINTINA ALVAREZ HUERTA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Pittman et al v. Bayer Healthcare AG et al
as 3:2010cv11761
Plaintiff:
Quintina N. Pittman and Jonathan Pittman
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Jackson et al
as 4:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dante Jackson and Quintina Jackson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FORD et al v. BUCKWALTER et al
as 2:2008cv05322
Plaintiff:
ADONIS FORD, DIARRA MAYO, NATHANIEL FORD and others
Defendant:
DARRIN BUCKWALTER, MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN and JOHN DOE #1-5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
