Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Russel v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02741
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Selene Finance, LP, Wilmington Savings Fund Society and others
Plaintiff:
Betty R. Russel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Allbaugh
as 19-6017
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH R. RUSSELL, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
JOE ALLBAUGH
Russell v. Escobar et al
as 3:2018cv00660
Defendant:
Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company, Jose F. Bonilla Escobar and Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James R. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v. Virtus Pharmaceuticals OPCO, II, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01063
Plaintiff:
Terri R. Russell and Timothy Russell
Defendant:
Virtus Pharmaceuticals OPCO, II, LLC and Pharmatech, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Whalen et al
as 4:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Russell
Defendant:
Tasha Whalen, Douglas Bolton, Chris Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01053
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R RUSSELL
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2018cv00379
Petitioner:
Kenneth R Russell, Jr
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark #222915 v. LaPlante et al
as 2:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
Tom LaPlante, Unknown Burke, Unknown Fredrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Russell et al
as 3:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Leonard A Mack
Defendant:
N. R. Russell and Six (6) Unnamed Corrections Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Stein v. D. Gill, et al
as 17-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DEAN STEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. GILL, Corrections Officer, L. MAKI, 034 Hearing Officer, S. RAYMOND, Hearing Investigator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
