Cases 31 - 40 of 61
RAINBOLT v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01172
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
ANGELA JEAN RAINBOLT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitson v. Rainbolt et al
as 6:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Gregory Whitson
Defendant:
Tiffany Rainbolt, Matthew W Stiles and Maynard, Cooper & Gale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GEICO General Insurance Company v. Shaw et al
as 8:2016cv00058
Defendant:
Bryan Medical Center West, Department of the Navy Medical Care Recovery Unit, Hastings Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Rainbolt v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03575
Plaintiff:
Elisha Rainbolt
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
Dorinda Schwartz , Bridgette Davis , Monique Davis and others
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. Cole et al
as 6:2014cv06489
Plaintiff:
ShaVelle Lamarr Scott
Defendant:
David V. Cole, James L. Allard, Matthew P. Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Fred N Stanci, et al
as 4:2014mc00002
Respondent:
Stephen L LaFrance Pharmacy Inc and David Rainbolt
Movant:
Luther Sutter
Trustee:
US Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rainbolt v. Seacor Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rainbolt
Defendant:
Seacor Holdings Inc., SCF Waxler Marine, LLC and SCF Marine Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
