Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Rivera v. NYC Department of Birth Certificate et al
as 1:2017cv01676
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Rivera
Defendant:
NYC Department of Birth Certificate and Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00699
Petitioner:
Robert Raymond John Wilder
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Raymond v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00719
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv07768
Petitioner:
ROBERT RAYMOND CARMAN, JR.
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Binkley v. Angelico et al
as 1:2010cv03679
Plaintiff:
David Binkley
Defendant:
Elyse Angelico, Aaron Baldwin, Karen Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burokas v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv03530
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Burokas and Judith Burokas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gino Paolino v. Jeff Lloyd et al
as 2:2014cv05116
Defendant:
Austin Chen, Joy McKnight Chen, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Gino Paolino
LaMontagne et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15109
Plaintiff:
Laurianne LaMontagne and Robert Raymond LaMontagne
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
