Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Ice Services, LLC v. Regal Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mi00001
Plaintiff:
Ice Services, LLC
Defendant:
Regal Marketing, Inc., Regal Marketing, LLC, W.G. Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Dunahue v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
David Knott, III , Jamin M Crawford , S Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfield Solutions LLC v. Success Grain Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Winfield Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Success Grain Inc, J Todd Berry, Glenna S Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franchi v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00961
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Defendant:
Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Douglas N. Benham, Charles M. Elson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Miller v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Douglas N. Benham, Charles E. Elson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Beaty v. Record's Lane County Jail
as 6:2017cv01510
Plaintiff:
Mickey D. Beaty
Defendant:
Record's Lane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. METROPOLITAN MGMT. CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv00786
Plaintiff:
EILEEN G. BROWN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN MGMT. CORP., LATCH'S LANE OWNERS ASSOCIATION and D. BARRY PRITCHARD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carter v. Earthlink Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00433
Plaintiff:
Sam Carter
Defendant:
Earthlink Holdings Corp. , Joseph F. Eazor , Susan D. Bowick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Whitney Bank v. S M I Companies Global Inc et al
as 6:2016cv01427
Plaintiff:
Whitney Bank
Defendant:
S M I Companies Global Inc and Vaughn S Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
