Cases 31 - 40 of 345
Munn v. Bates et al
as 3:2022cv02595
Plaintiff:
Lester J Munn and Lester Joe Munn
Defendant:
Michael Bates, Jimmy Sisson and Sandra Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diversified Land Acquisitions, LLC v. TAAN Investors LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Diversified Land Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant:
TAAN Investors LLC, Steve Sisson and Ayers Family Investors I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sisson v. Kadenzo Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03722
Plaintiff:
Karen Sisson
Defendant:
Kadenzo Enterprises, Inc. and Neil Roberts
SISSON v. FORESTAL
as 1:2022cv01725
Petitioner:
IVY R. SISSON
Respondent:
KERRY J. FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry James Samples v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv05596
Plaintiff:
Barry James Samples
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Los Angeles County, Medical Staff of CSP-LAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dittoe v. Colleir et al
as 4:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
John Dittoe
Defendant:
Bryan Colleir, Elbert Holems, Jimmy Sisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burley #502426 v. Weller et al
as 1:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Edward Donald Burley #502426
Defendant:
D. Weller, Unknown Nalley, Unknown Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisson v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brian Sisson
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erik Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sisson v. Potchen
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Donald R Sisson
Defendant:
Potchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisson v. Potchen
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Donald R Sisson
Defendant:
Potchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
