Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Cornelius Tucker v. Corporal Kivett
as 19-6161
Defendant / Appellee:
SETTLE, CORPORAL KIVETT, SHIPMAN, Medical Technician and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Williams v. Baskett
as 6:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Corporal Baskett, Salem Police Department, Jerry Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Corey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LOVEJOY et al
as 1:2019cv00057
Defendant:
THOMAS FAGERLI, JASON CRUMP, OFFICER LOVEJOY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
OFFICER M. D. MARTINEZ, G. ISENHOUR, 2 HOMICIDE DETECTIVES and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS ALVIN BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIVETT et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
SHERIFF SCHATZMAN, CPL. KIVETT, CAPT. GUARD SETTLE and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Salem Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv11531
Defendant:
Mr. Brian Butler, Salem Police Department and City of Salem
Plaintiff:
Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roth v. Salem Police Department, et al
as 6:2018cv00231
Defendant:
Jennifer Lance and Salem Police Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
YOUNG v. ROUNTREE et al
as 1:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
JAMES JETER JR YOUNG
Defendant:
BARRY ROUNTREE and WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
