Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv23953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Pagan (Sanchez)
as 18-1244
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Herrera, AKA King Aventura, Rogelio Ramos, AKA King Bogelio, Fernando Merlo, AKA King Dinero and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Christian Sanchez, AKA King Chi Chi
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis and Linda Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04927
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv02438
Plaintiff:
Ricky Steven Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
In re : German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02796
Defendant:
: German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation, Audi of America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Briscoe, Marilyn Fong, Travis Burton and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert B. Kinkade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Burton et al v. BMW AG et al
as 3:2017cv04314
Defendant:
BMW AG , BMW North America, LLC , Volkswagen AG and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Burton and Steven Lewis
Movant:
Gabriel Briscoe
Burton et al v. BMW AG et al
as 3:2017cv04314
Defendant:
BMW AG, BMW North America, LLC, Volkswagen AG and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Burton and Steven Lewis
Movant:
Gabriel Briscoe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Nevels v. Lane
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis Nevels
Defendant:
Cindy Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevels v. Chapman et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis Nevels
Defendant:
Travis Chapman, Cindy Lane and Steve Mcullar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
