Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Dental et al v. City of Salem Police Department et al
as 0:2013cv01659
Plaintiff:
Bales And Brady Towing West, LLC, Gary Dental, Timothy Hall and others
Defendant:
City of Keizer Police Department, City of Salem Police Department, Tyson Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2013cv00575
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cryer v. MA Department of Correction, et al
as 13-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Interested Party:
JOHN DIAZ
Scoggins v. Hall
as 12-2338
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN SCOGGINS, a/k/a Allen Alston
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HALL
Hall v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 1:2012cv01484
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. TITLE 11 FUNDING et al
as 2:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HALL
Defendant:
TITLE 11 FUNDING, HSBC BANK, N.A. and LVNV FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hall v. Milliken et al
as 3:2011cv00936
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hall
Defendant:
S. Milliken, K. Adams, Steven F. Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Costa v. Hall, et al
as 11-1025
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS R. COSTA
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HALL, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institute and THOMAS REILLY
Cryer v. MA Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE CRYER DEREK SINCERE BLACK WOLF CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. BENDER and RONALD T. DUVAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
