Cases 31 - 40 of 336
Montes v. Tibbs
as 4:2023cv01352
Plaintiff:
Daniel Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
Bertha A. Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tibbs v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
David Tibbs
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
TIBBS v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TIBBS
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv04586
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Andrews, Donald Smith, Cornell Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv10244
Plaintiff:
John Andrews, Donald Smith, Cornell Shelby and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Tibbs v. Gender Dysphoria Group et al
as 1:2022cv11849
Plaintiff:
Jerome Tibbs and Nina Harmony Tibbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Gender Dysphoria Group, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tibbs v. Lepe
as 1:2022cv02798
Plaintiff:
Sequarn Tibbs
Defendant:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eakle v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
David Eakle
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Falcon Owens
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varner v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jacob Varner
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
