Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Dean Eugene Whipp, et al. v. 3M Co., et al.
as NCW/1:10-CV-00059
Defendant:
3M Co
Plaintiff:
Dean Eugene Whipp
Whipp et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Dean Eugene Whipp and Marilyn Whipp
Defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rousseau v. Whipp et al
as 1:2009cv00955
Plaintiff:
Peter Rousseau
Defendant:
Michael Whipp and Betsy Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Whipp, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al.
as 1:2008cv02590
Plaintiff:
Theresa Whipp, Theresa Whipp, Bryan Whipp and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C R Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Whipp, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al.
as 2:2008cv01554
Plaintiff:
Theresa Whipp, Theresa Whipp, Theresa Whipp and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C R Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Estate of Shannon Marie Boone et al v. United States of America Department of the Army
as 1:2008cv00658
Plaintiff:
Estate of Shannon Marie Boone, Mark A. Boone, Debbie L. Ramsburg Whipp and others
Defendant:
United States of America Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Whipp v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv01102
Plaintiff:
Gaye L Whipp
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
R.C. Fournier Company v. Whipp & Bourne, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
R.C. Fournier Company and R.C. Fournier Company
Defendant:
Whipp & Bourne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
