Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Coleman v. McRae
as 5:2016hc02046
Petitioner:
William Coleman
Respondent:
James McRae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. CITY OF LONG BRANCH et al
as 3:2015cv07314
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF LONG BRANCH, ADAMS SCHNEIDER, JASON ROEBUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Di Sarro v. Willco S.C. Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03057
Plaintiff:
Tyler Di Sarro
Defendant:
Willco S.C. Inc. and William Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Coleman v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv07186
Plaintiff:
William Coleman
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv05508
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COLEMAN v. SNOWDEN et al
as 3:2015cv04270
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE H. SNOWDEN, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and LONG BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 3:2015cv03539
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
ADAMS SCHNEIDER, JASON ROEBUCK, NICHOLAS ROMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2014cv02434
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Anthony William Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swendel et al v. Board of Education of Prince George's County et al
as 8:2014cv01757
Plaintiff:
Gary Swendel and ShayLa Deniece Willis
Defendant:
Board of Education of Prince George's County, Tiffany Cheek, William Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abner et al v. Hercules, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Abner , Jerry Abrams , Maggie Allen and others
Defendant:
Hercules, Inc. and Ashland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
