Cases 41 - 50 of 3,628
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Defendant:
DEZARAY WALLACE and RICHARD GASKIN
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGore v. US District Court Judges et al
as 2:2024cv11510
Defendant:
John R. Roberts, US Supreme Court Justices, US Court of Appeals Justices and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Antonio Hood v. Drive Sally, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04772
Defendant:
Drive Sally, LLC and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hood v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Carla Hood
Defendant:
Horizon Bank Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Sheri Panabaker, Ruston Panabaker, Mark D Taylor and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Battle v. Hood
as 1:2024cv04622
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant:
Michael James Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Kelly Storm, Dr. Aradhana Gill, R. Hale and others
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Defendant:
Brittany Khanzada, Patrick Esse, Carlos Samour, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Carey Brock, Travis Hood, Peter Gleichman and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 fr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
