Cases 41 - 50 of 1,652
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00641
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Melissa J. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson (PS) v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv03422
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Gillian Clark, Michael Hegarty, Paul Wiese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Clark, et al
as 24-1015
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GILLIAN CLARK, MICHAEL HEGARTY, PAUL WIESE and others
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Barry P. Johnson, Barry N. Johnson, Scott J. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Johnson et al v. Unknown et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Johnson and Rhonda Sallie
Defendant:
Sheri Unknown, TitleMax Incorporated (Lufkin Store) and TitleMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
