Cases 41 - 50 of 830
Smith v. Monti et al
as 3:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Warden Monti, L. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Esochaghi
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Smith
Defendant:
Doctor Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Smith
Defendant:
Doctor Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darden v. St. Louis Airport and City Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dominique Darden
Defendant:
St. Louis Airport and City Dept., Lt. Unknown Thomas, Lt. Unknown Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
D.A. v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
D. A.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Josh Highberger, Brandon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 22-1470
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMEIA O. SMITH, also known as OMAR also known as D
Nathan Smith v. Christies Auction et al
as 2:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith and Nathan O. Smith
Defendant:
Christies Auction, Sotheby Auction, Bonhams Auction and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Isiah Smith v. Chris Buesgen
as 21-3398
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISIAH O. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS S. BUESGEN
United States of America v. Boykin (Brice)
as 21-2794
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Boykin, AKA Double O, Paul Arline, AKA Face, Joshua Arnold and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Brice, AKA Reack
Smith v. Yum Restaurant Services Group LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01219
Plaintiff:
Elderick O Smith
Defendant:
Yum Restaurant Services Group LLC and Davis House No 1 Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
